LO Funds
TargetNetZero Europe Equity

MARKET REVIEW

February was a highly eventful month, marked by significant geopolitical and economic developments. The month began with the Trump administration threatening to impose tariffs on Canada, Mexico, and China, creating initial market jitters. It concluded with a contentious meeting between President Zelensky and President Trump, adding to the geopolitical tension.

Mid-month marked an unexpected rise in inflation figures. The prospect of higher tariffs further fueled inflation concerns, leading investors to reassess their expectations for future interest rate cuts.

Overall, the combination of geopolitical tensions and inflationary pressures contributed to a volatile and uncertain market landscape throughout February.

The Fund ended February with a positive absolute performance, above with its benchmark, the MSCI Europe ND index.

PERFORMANCE COMMENT

The total benchmark performance was up with key sector movements noted. Financials and Communication Services sectors, exhibited positive performance at 8.0% and 5.5%, respectively. In contrast, the Real Estate sector underperformed, despite a positive performance of 0.5%.

The Fund’s performance ended February above its benchmark which can be fully explained by the implementation of its climate strategy, that we breakdown into three components:

- Net Zero Target: The primary objective of aligning with net zero targets had a positive impact of 0.08% on excess returns..

- Carbon Reduction vs. Benchmark: Efforts to reduce the carbon footprint relative to the benchmark contributed positively to the excess return by +0.11%.

- Exclusions: The exclusions from LOIM Sustainability Investment Policy was added +0.13% to the excess return.

This month’s excess return was driven by both sector allocation and stock selection.

Sector allocation contributed +0.06% to the excess return, with noteworthy performance arising from an underweighting in Energy alongside an overweighting in Communication Services and Financials, successfully leveraging the risk on environment for European equities.

Stock selection was a key driver of our excess return. Significant gains were primarily due to our strategic positioning within the Industrials and Financial sectors. Notably, our overweight positions in companies like ABB, which demonstrate strong and credible decarbonization perspectives, significantly boosted our performance. Conversely, our underweight positions in companies like ABB and Prysmian, which exhibit weaker decarbonization perspectives, also contributed positively to our stock selection.

CLIMATE OUTLOOK

Disparities in the Energy Sector

Based on news from last month, the energy sector is witnessing significant disparities in the transition to net zero. BP announced a major shift in its investment strategy, cutting back on renewable energy plans and focusing on 20 new oil and gas projects by 2030. This decision, driven by poor performance and pressure from hedge fund Elliott Management, highlights the challenges faced by carbon-intensive industries in transitioning to new markets. BP's struggle underscores the broader issue of whether to stick to existing business models or risk failure by entering the renewable energy sector.

In contrast, TotalEnergies SE and Air Liquide SA are moving forward with a €600 million joint venture to produce green hydrogen for TotalEnergies' refinery in the Netherlands and supply its petrochemical plant in Belgium. This initiative, part of TotalEnergies' strategy to reduce emissions using low-carbon hydrogen, marks a significant step in their ambition to decarbonize hydrogen consumption at their European refineries by 2030. The projects, expected to be operational by 2027 and 2029, respectively, will leverage offshore wind power and aim to avoid annual emissions equivalent to 500,000 tons of carbon dioxide.

These contrasting approaches within the energy sector highlight the momentum, forces, and challenges faced by carbon-intensive industries in the transition to net zero. Companies can either maintain their existing business models and face declining profits or take the risk of entering new markets.