We use cookies that are necessary to make our site work as well as analytics cookie and third-party cookies to monitor our traffic and to personalise content and ads.
Please click “Cookies Settings” for details on how to withdraw your consent and how to block cookies. For more detailed information about the cookies we use and of who we work this see our cookies policy
Necessary cookies:
Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website and cannot be switched off in our systems. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will then not work. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.
Statistic and marketing cookies:
Statistic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers. We work with third parties and make use of third party cookies to make advertising messaging more relevant to you both on and off this website.
Bullish despite AI bubble fears? Why we remain risk-on, for now
Yannik Zufferey, PhD
Chief Investment Officer, Core Business
LOIM Core investment teams
key takeaways.
Despite another year of strong gains across equity and credit markets, many of our long-only investment teams retain their risk-on stance
The bullishness of retail investors is being balanced by more defensive institutional positioning, which could cushion any market setbacks
Is there an AI stock bubble? The current technology craze has support from corporate earnings – unlike the dotcom bubble – and attractive opportunities persist beyond the US and some tech assets, in our view.
Against the odds, 2025 has seen truly mind-blowing performance across equity and credit markets. This has led to much discussion about whether the high valuations assigned to AI stocks is merited. Does the bullishness simply mirror the technology’s rapid integration into our daily lives? Or are markets reaching dangerous heights? Our Portfolio Managers across asset classes interrogated this topic, and decided – for now – to maintain their risk-on stances. Here’s why.
It's hard to ignore the strength of market sentiment at the moment. For the first time since the middle of 2024, all asset classes are trending higher, including bonds. But can this bullishness persist? The current cycle owes much to the buying frenzy from retail investors, who are significantly concentrated in their exposures. Yet, when looking at market positioning, the long developed markets (DM) equities trade is not overcrowded globally. Moreover, institutional investors globally are more defensively positioned (see Figure 1), which could help cushion any retail-led market setbacks.
Naturally, today's positive market sentiment means some segments appear expensive or even overvalued. Globally, multiples now stand at 10% (for DM equities) to 20% (for emerging market (EM) equities). These levels are higher than a year ago, despite increased geopolitical tensions and market uncertainties. Our analysis shows that today's trendiest assets, particularly US equities, offer limited risk-reward potential (see Figure 2). However, other areas – notably EM bonds, European equities and Asian equities – still offer attractive opportunities.
Making this distinction is crucial. Otherwise, there is a temptation to dismiss all current valuations as irrational. In addition, strong corporate earnings are evident across asset classes that aren't universally overbought, meaning that exceptional earnings often justifies premiums that initially appear expensive.
FIG 2. Yields relative to cash rates across asset classes2
The tech frenzy has significantly transformed global indices. AI stocks, which make up approximately 5% of the names in the MSCI World Index, have seen the value of their Index representation shift from around 5% to nearly 30%.3 Is this trend sustainable?
Unlike the 2000 dotcom bubble, today's AI complex consistently beats earnings expectations and appears to be attracting faster adoption rates. While AI capital expenditure might appear concerning, a substantial portion of the sector remains cash-rich and finances investments internally, which differs from the dot.com example. Currently, technology equipment investment contributes approximately 30-50 basis points to GDP growth, acting as a positive economic force.3 Moreover, these investments could serve applications beyond AI itself, marking another significant difference from the prior internet bubble.
What signs of weakness should investors monitor? We highlight three key indicators:
Double ordering, or companies placing orders with multiple suppliers due to component shortage concerns despite unchanged demand
The end of earnings upgrades with sell-side analysts raising multiples to justify further price appreciation
Massive capacity expansion late in the cycle.
These warning signs are not currently evident in today's market. In particular, we believe Chinese tech companies remain attractive from a valuation perspective and carry relatively little debt, while Asian tech is generally focused on real-world applications and the rapid realisation of positive cash flows.
Our positioning across asset classes
At the time of writing, our investment teams remain content to maintain balanced risk exposures in the belief that this rally could have further upside potential, with market declines representing opportunities to add to positions.
Multi asset. The All Roads team remains neutral, with market exposure rising to around 155%, with its allocation remaining well balanced between protection assets at 57% and 43% for cyclical (rebased to 100%).
Fixed income. Our Global Fixed Income team is neutrally positioned, with an underweight to sovereigns, which favours Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) over nominal US Treasuries, and an overweight to EM hard-currency debt. Within credit, exposure to investment grade and high yield (HY) is neutral, with a defensive and selective tilt. Our Asia Fixed Income team favours defensive HY and is overweight India, commodities, insurance and emerging market HY sovereigns.
Convertible bonds. The team is positive on the US, China and Japan, and neutral on Europe. They are constructive on equities globally, focusing on key themes such as AI – where positioning has shifted to software. US exposure now focuses on onshoring and other strategic activities. In Europe, exporters, industrials and companies linked to electrification are favoured.
Equities. Our Global Equities team is overweight EM at the expense of the US. In terms of sectors, it remains overweight technology, media and telecoms, and has raised its allocation to European luxury stocks. Our Swiss Equities team is overweight communication services, information technology and industrials, and underweight consumer discretionary, materials, real estate and utilities. The Asia Equities team remains overweight China and Hong Kong, and underweight India, favouring IT and consumer discretionary stocks.
view sources.
+
[1] Source: LOIM, Bloomberg. As of 13 November 2025. For illustrative purposes only.
[2] Source: LOIM, Bloomberg. As of 13 November 2025. For illustrative purposes only.
[3] Source: Bloomberg, LOIM at 13 November 2025.
important information.
For professional investors use only
This document is a Corporate Communication for Professional Investors only and is not a marketing communication related to a fund, an investment product or investment services in your country. This document is not intended to provide investment, tax, accounting, professional or legal advice.