Upside through the bumps
What a year! Global equities didn’t just keep the momentum from 2024 – they accelerated. But the ride was not without bumps. The late-2024 ‘Trump trade’ quickly lost steam and reversed as favour shifted to Europe and China. Then came Trump’s tariffs, which reshuffled the deck completely – disrupting growth, inflation and trade expectations before negotiations restored stability by the third quarter. Meanwhile, geopolitical tensions added to uncertainty. Corporate earnings remained robust despite these challenges, underpinning equities.
Of course, the exponential progress of generative artificial intelligence also dominated market headlines in 2025, with strategic moves from major players like Nvidia, Microsoft, Google, and Meta1 reshaping value chains. While markets swung between optimism and doubt about AI, the overall trend stayed positive.
All of these dynamics drove significant rotations across regions, sectors and investment styles in 2025. Despite sharp market swings and heightened volatility, our approach demonstrated resilience, outperforming the benchmark while maintaining a low tracking error (see Figures 1-3). It is also worth noting that our emerging market TargetNetZero strategy, launched in July, delivered successfully on its stated objectives.
Here we analyse how much the net-zero component of our strategies contributed to performance last year and explore how enhancements to our portfolio construction process benefited investors. Finally, we look ahead to what 2026 may bring.
Read also: Forward thinking in net-zero investing: four myths debunked
FIG 1. TargetNetZero Global strategy gross composite2 excess return vs benchmark3
FIG 2. TargetNetZero Europe strategy gross composite4 excess return vs benchmark5
FIG 3. TargetNetZero Global ex-CH strategy gross composite6 excess return vs benchmark7
How much did NetZero contribute?
Every year, we ask ourselves the same question: how much did the NetZero component of our strategy actually add to performance? Put differently, has aiming for a portfolio temperature more ambitious than the benchmark started to pay off, and are we seeing a clear trend?
To dig into this, we used our in-house performance attribution model, which breaks down excess returns into the contributions of the portfolio’s building blocks. For TargetNetZero strategies, excess returns can be explained by four key components: NetZero, carbon footprint reduction, ESG exclusions, and the key enhancements to our portfolio construction process (alpha and dividend optimisation).
Figures 4 and 5 show the performance of the NetZero component for the TargetNetZero Global and Europe strategies since inception, both including and excluding the Energy sector. Assessing results ex-Energy is particularly interesting because the energy sector is highly sensitive to macroeconomic and geopolitical factors – often the main drivers of short-term performance, independent of climate-transition dynamics.
Overall, the trend is positive, and it is even more pronounced in global equities.
FIG 4. TNZ Global: performance contribution from NetZero component8
FIG 5. TNZ Europe: performance contribution from NetZero component9
Portfolio enhancements
In 2025, the TargetNetZero Global and Global ex-CH strategies benefited from additional enhancements in the form of systematic alpha overlay and dividend tax optimisation.
Systematic alpha overlay strengthens the integration of the net-zero theme by targeting short-term performance opportunities. The approach applies style tilts across equities, guided by momentum, macro and machine learning models under tight risk controls. This adds an extra layer of diversification to the portfolio and builds resilience, while ensuring alignment with net-zero goals.
While not all of those signals delivered in 2025, momentum was strong enough to ensure the overall positive result (see Figure 6).
Dividend tax optimisation aims to reduce the amount of withholding taxes by dynamically shifting the portfolio away from stocks with upcoming dividend payments. This strategy delivered savings close to the target of 0.1%, which, however, was partially offset by a negative impact on gross performance.
FIG 6. TNZ Global: performance contribution from systematic alpha10
Looking Ahead in 2026
The recent shift in U.S. climate policies has created headwinds for sustainable investing this year, especially for low-carbon strategies, where some investors worry the climate theme might be overcrowded.
In our view, focusing on real portfolio decarbonisation rather than simply favoring low emitters remains an untapped source of value creation for 2026, regardless of policy changes. And the momentum is clear: the number of companies with validated decarbonisation targets keeps rising steadily. Today, more than 80% of MSCI World Index constituents have set such targets, compared with fewer than 50% just three years ago11.
Read also: What do the EU’s SFDR 2.0 proposals mean for sustainable investing?
From a macro standpoint, a mix of soft growth and a less restrictive monetary stance is creating a reasonably supportive environment for financial assets. That being said, 2026 will come with its own risks. After two years of stellar market returns, valuations look stretched – particularly in the U.S. and around the AI theme. If a bubble were to form, it would likely start with missed earnings expectations. That hasn’t happened yet, but markets will be extremely sensitive to any disappointment.
Emerging markets stand out as particularly attractive, supported by a weaker US dollar and compelling valuations. This could not only benefit EM equities, but also provide a tailwind for developed markets, keeping the overall market environment risk-on.
As in previous years, we will remain committed to implementing a disciplined and truly diversified investment approach for the transition to net zero.
To learn more about our TNZ equity strategy, click here.