investment viewpoints

Challenging a US energy firm on exiting coal

Challenging a US energy firm on exiting coal
Rebeca Coriat - Head of Stewardship

Rebeca Coriat

Head of Stewardship
Anouchka Miquel - Stewardship Analyst

Anouchka Miquel

Stewardship Analyst

Phasing out coal generation is essential to remaining within temperature targets aligned to the Paris Agreement and achieving net zero. For energy providers, this can present an uncertain path. This case study outlines our engagement actions with an energy firm on its decarbonisation strategy and targets for renewable energy.

 

Need to know

  • We engaged a large retail energy provider in the US, which had demonstrated good progress in reducing emissions, with SBTi-aligned decarbonisation targets in place since 2015
  • It appears that the company does not include purchased energy in its disclosure of scope 3 emissions, leading to a possible misreporting – or non-reporting – of most of its emissions. In addition, it is unclear if the company will reach its SBTi verified 1.5°C 2025 targets as it will not have fully exited coal before 2030
  • We are pushing the company to go through to the SBTi verification process for net-zero commitment to ensure their decarbonisation strategy is aligned with the Paris Agreement and, if not, to take actions to review its strategy

 

Exiting coal power

The Net Zero Emissions by 2050 Scenario (NZE) from the IEA shows a pathway for the global energy sector to achieve net-zero CO2 emissions by 2050. It projects unabated coal generation being completely phased out by 2030 in advanced economies and by 2040 globally. Under this scenario, countries and companies not aligning with these timelines risk contributing to an overshoot of temperature targets committed to under the Paris Agreement – and could become exposed to the economic risks derived from stranded coal assets.

Exiting coal power in advanced economies is not without obstacles, as demonstrated by one of our engagements with a US energy provider. In the following case study, we show the importance of qualitative and quantitative research in pushing for decarbonisation plans to be verified through the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi). The SBTi drives ambitious climate action in the private sector by providing a clear process for organisations to set science-based emissions reduction targets. We also highlight the risk of corporate misreporting on emissions and explain how we have sought confirmation from the firm about the percentage of renewable energy it intends to secure in order to phase out coal.

 

Engagement background

We engaged a large retail energy provider in the US, which had demonstrated good progress in reducing emissions, with SBTi-aligned decarbonisation targets in place since 2015. The company claims to be a sustainability leader and that it is investing in cleaner sources of energy for both domestic and commercial clients. It has publicly announced plans which outline a clear path to decarbonisation, including crucial plans to exit coal.

In addition, there are programs in place for coal combustions residuals (CCRs), typically coal ash, which mitigates the need for additional coal mining. CCRs are produced primarily from the burning of coal in coal-fired power plants and may be recycled into products like concrete or wallboard. CCRs provide environmental benefits such as reduced greenhouse gas emissions, less need for disposing in landfills, and reduced use of other materials.

 

Engagement action

Our stewardship team’s climate engagement strategy is aligned with the Oxford Martin Principles, which focus on net-zero commitment, a profitable net-zero business model and quantitative medium-term targets. The principles state a crucial test of any investment strategy is whether it drives or hinders bringing about net zero emissions before global temperatures exceed 2°C. Our analysis revealed inconsistencies in the company’s decarbonisation strategy, especially regarding the company’s plans for coal, and we sought to confirm its overall exposure to fossil fuel and whether the company was not increasing its production or capacity of?thermal coal. According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), phasing out coal from the electricity sector is the single most important step to align with 1.5°C. The UN intergovernmental body has specified that global coal use in electricity generation must fall by 80% below 2010 levels by 2030, and OECD nations should end coal use entirely by 2030.

 

Engagement outcome

Our engagement highlighted the need to continue to push the company on its decarbonisation strategy. It is shifting its business model from electricity production to electricity retail, which will have the effect of moving the majority of its carbon emissions from scope 1 to scope 3 upstream. However, it appears that the company does not include purchased energy in its disclosure of scope 3 emissions, leading to a possible misreporting – or non-reporting – of most of its emissions. In addition, it is unclear if the company will reach its SBTi verified 1.5°C 2025 targets as it will not have fully exited coal before 2030. Finally, we have not yet had confirmation on what percentage of renewable energy will be purchased.

 

Next steps

We are pushing the company to go through to the SBTi verification process for its net-zero commitment to ensure its decarbonisation strategy is aligned with the Paris Agreement and, if not, to take actions to review its strategy, especially regarding its coal exiting plan. In the mean time, we have revised the company’s targets in our ITR tools, which has resulted in an increase of the company’s temperature alignment. We have also strongly emphasised the need to secure renewable-energy supply, and have requested reported figures and targets so that we can monitor progress.

important information.

For professional investor use only.
This document is issued by Lombard Odier Asset Management (Europe) Limited, authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (the “FCA”), and entered on the FCA register with registration number 515393.
Lombard Odier Investment Managers (“LOIM”) is a trade name. This document is provided for information purposes only and does not constitute an offer or a recommendation to purchase or sell any security or service. It is not intended for distribution, publication, or use in any jurisdiction where such distribution, publication, or use would be unlawful. This material does not contain personalized recommendations or advice and is not intended to substitute any professional advice on investment in financial products. Before entering into any transaction, an investor should consider carefully the suitability of a transaction to his/her particular circumstances and, where necessary, obtain independent professional advice in respect of risks, as well as any legal, regulatory, credit, tax, and accounting consequences. This document is the property of LOIM and is addressed to its recipient exclusively for their personal use. It may not be reproduced (in whole or in part), transmitted, modified, or used for any other purpose without the prior written permission of LOIM. This material contains the opinions of LOIM, as at the date of issue.
Any benchmarks/indices cited herein are provided for information purposes only. No benchmark/index is directly comparable to the investment objectives, strategy or universe of a fund. The performance of a benchmark shall not be indicative of past or future performance of any fund. It should not be assumed that the relevant fund will invest in any specific securities that comprise any index, nor should it be understood to mean that there is a correlation between such fund’s returns and any index returns.
Neither this document nor any copy thereof may be sent, taken into, or distributed in the United States of America, any of its territories or possessions or areas subject to its jurisdiction, or to or for the benefit of a United States Person. For this purpose, the term “United States Person” shall mean any citizen, national or resident of the United States of America, partnership organized or existing in any state, territory or possession of the United States of America, a corporation organized under the laws of the United States or of any state, territory or possession thereof, or any estate or trust that is subject to United States Federal income tax regardless of the source of its income.
Source of the figures: Unless otherwise stated, figures are prepared by LOIM.
Although certain information has been obtained from public sources believed to be reliable, without independent verification, we cannot guarantee its accuracy or the completeness of all information available from public sources. Views and opinions expressed are for informational purposes only and do not constitute a recommendation by LOIM to buy, sell or hold any security. Views and opinions are current as of the date of this presentation and may be subject to change. They should not be construed as investment advice.
No part of this material may be (i) copied, photocopied or duplicated in any form, by any means, or (ii) distributed to any person that is not an employee, officer, director, or authorised agent of the recipient, without Lombard Odier Asset Management (Europe) Limited prior consent. In the United Kingdom, this material is a marketing material and has been approved by Lombard Odier Asset Management (Europe) Limited which is authorized and regulated by the FCA.
©2022 Lombard Odier IM. All rights reserved.