multi-asset
How to stay diversified when volatility rises
In the first three weeks of 2022, global markets witnessed intense price action that is more usually seen over an entire quarter. While last year hinted at a more turbulent environment in 2022, the intensity of the change in sentiment this year proved both pronounced and somewhat surprising.
What drove such seismic shifts and what potential outcomes do we foresee?
Need to know
|
---|
December: dispersion and the dawn of value
In December 2021, the attentive investor would have spotted two key elements. First, the dispersion within and between equity indices reached a very high level. Among the many indicators of dispersion, the percentage of NYSE stocks closing above their 200-day moving average fell from 80% in July to 40% in the first few days of December last year1. This suggested a much smaller proportion of stocks were driving gains in the index, signalling a significant turn in conviction.
Our analysis suggests that this does not necessarily compromise potential returns, but rather pairs them with greater volatility: periods of dispersion across stocks usually translate into a period of positive returns but with high volatility. The risk-oriented investor will see in this a period of Sharpe ratio moderation: positive returns but with heightened risks.
The second key element was value stocks starting to deliver solid returns – to the extent that they outperformed growth stocks – for only the second time in 2021. Over a period of one month, growth stocks rose by a solid 2% while value delivered 7% returns2.
Both elements - dispersion and the rotation to value - presaged what gripped markets in January: a fast-paced bearish rotation.
January: bearish rotation on hawkish signals
Indeed, during the first 20 days of the year value stocks posted 0% returns while growth stocks plunged by no less than 8%3.
The divergence between growth and value stocks is deeply rooted in the pandemic and its aftermath. Growth stocks soared by an astonishing 120% from the lows of March 2020 to 2021 due to a delicate combination of fantastic earnings growth and a simultaneous plunge in rates. The world became accustomed to ultra-low rates and – more importantly – to negative rates. In the US, 10-year real rates dipped to -1% while their German equivalent saw levels less than -2%. In that context, growth stocks took it all and Cathie Wood outmatched Warren Buffet by far4.
With the Federal Reserve acknowledging the necessity to curb the strength of demand in mid-December, and the firm January inflation report, real rates gained suddenly, rising by about 50 bps. More than any other factor, this rise in real rates fuelled a different kind of rotation, a bearish rotation, on the back of renewed uncertainty.
MSCI value vs MSCI growth vs US 10-year real rates, 2018-2022
Source: Bloomberg, LOIM. As of 19 January 2022.
Unfunded growth washout
World equities declined by only 3% but beneath the surface significantly more agitation was apparent as growth stocks underperformed. The Nasdaq broke a -10% return while Cathie Wood’s famous ARK ETF doubled that loss5. Over the same period, the Eurostoxx rose a couple of basis points and emerging-market equities gained about 1%.
The “unfunded growth6” enabled by the era of ultra-low rates was largely washed out in three weeks, with drawdowns as large as -20% for stocks such as Zoom or Robin Hood7 – representative of a certain new-world economy irrationally buoyed by low rates.
Will January set the tone for 2022?
The essential questions now are: will 2022 continue the trajectory of its first three weeks? How can a diversified portfolio be positioned in such an environment?
The main impetus for the rotation is the rise in real rates. And the chief factor that explains its bearish characteristic is the pace of the rise in real rates, as investors digested a more hawkish stance from central banks and took profits accumulated in the past 12 months.
We expect 2022 to see a continuation of the rise in real rates and, therefore, a continuation in the rotation, but at a more sustainable pace: a normalisation rather than another dislocation.
Why the rise in real rates?
Real rates rise for two reasons: first, because central banks become hawkish. This was the case in 2005, 2013 or 2016 and should be no different at present, especially since central banks have become a major buyer of bonds. Let’s not forget that the Fed now holds assets worth about 40% of US GDP, with a vast majority of US Treasury bonds. The European Central Bank holds roughly the equivalent.
The second reason is a decline in savings: the world has accumulated an excess of cash on deposits. This excess is currently being drained by inflation: consumers most exposed to it now need to tap into their savings to maintain their standard of living. This as well seems more a normalisation than a dislocation at this stage, in our view.
Staying diversified while anticipating volatility
With the continuation of the rise in real rates we expect:
-
A continuation in the rotation within equity indices and between sectors. European and emerging stocks should outperform US ones, where growth is most concentrated. Financials and energy sectors should outperform the technology sector for the same reason. That price action should remain overall bullish – accounting for a slower rise in real yields on the back of solid earnings growth. We choose to stay exposed to equities but in a diversified way, with a preference for well-funded and quality growth.
-
Investors should prepare themselves to navigate more turbulent waters. This can be done in several ways using tailored, derivative-based solutions. For instance, long volatility strategies could offer interesting defensive characteristics, both in equities and bonds, as the volatility of bonds rises. Intraday trend strategies are also a natural way to buffer a portfolio against a sudden rise in volatility. They have proved useful in past dire times – February 2020 being the epitome of an unexpected surge in volatility.
Real rates are now showing signs they could increase as the macro situation requires. Earnings growth should help compensate the negative impact, but the rise in real rates could add to the currently more volatile environment.
Our view. We see continued risks looming and expect dispersion to harshly affect 2022. In this context, differentiation is key to positioning in equities while volatility strategies could offer interesting defensive characteristics. |
---|
Sources
informations importantes.
À l’usage des investisseurs professionnels uniquement
Le présent document a été publié par Lombard Odier Funds (Europe) S.A., société anonyme (SA) de droit luxembourgeois, ayant son siège social sis 291, route d’Arlon, 1150 Luxembourg, agréée et réglementée par la CSSF en tant que Société de gestion au sens de la directive 2009/65/CE, telle que modifiée, et au sens de la directive 2011/61/UE sur les gestionnaires de fonds d’investissement alternatifs (directive GFIA). La Société de gestion a pour objet la création, la promotion, l’administration, la gestion et la commercialisation d’OPCVM luxembourgeois et étrangers, de fonds d’investissement alternatifs (« FIA ») et d’autres fonds réglementés, d’organismes de placement collectif ou d’autres véhicules d’investissement, ainsi que l’offre de services de gestion de portefeuille et de conseil en investissement.
Lombard Odier Investment Managers (« LOIM ») est un nom commercial.
Ce document est fourni à titre d’information uniquement et ne constitue pas une offre ou une recommandation d’acquérir ou de vendre un titre ou un service quelconque. Il n’est pas destiné à être distribué, publié ou utilisé dans une quelconque juridiction où une telle distribution, publication ou utilisation serait illégale. Ce document ne contient pas de recommandations ou de conseils personnalisés et n’est pas destiné à remplacer un quelconque conseil professionnel sur l’investissement dans des produits financiers. Avant de conclure une transaction, l’investisseur doit examiner avec soin si celle-ci est adaptée à sa situation personnelle et, si besoin, obtenir des conseils professionnels indépendants au sujet des risques, ainsi que des conséquences juridiques, réglementaires, financières, fiscales ou comptables. Ce document est la propriété de LOIM et est adressé à son destinataire pour son usage personnel exclusivement. Il ne peut être reproduit (en totalité ou en partie), transmis, modifié ou utilisé dans un autre but sans l’accord écrit préalable de LOIM. Ce document contient les opinions de LOIM, à la date de publication.
Ni ce document ni aucune copie de ce dernier ne peuvent être envoyés, emmenés ou distribués aux États-Unis, dans l’un de leurs territoires, possessions ou zones soumises à leur juridiction, ni à une personne américaine ou dans l’intérêt d’une telle personne. À cet effet, l’expression « Personne américaine » désigne tout citoyen, ressortissant ou résident des États-Unis d’Amérique, toute association organisée ou existant dans tout État, territoire ou possession des États-Unis d’Amérique, toute société organisée en vertu des lois des États-Unis ou d’un État, d’un territoire ou d’une possession des États-Unis, ou toute succession ou trust soumis dont le revenu est imposable aux États-Unis, qu’en soit l’origine.
Source des chiffres : sauf mention contraire, les chiffres sont fournis par LOIM.
Bien que certaines informations aient été obtenues auprès de sources publiques réputées fiables, sans vérification indépendante, nous ne pouvons garantir leur exactitude ni l’exhaustivité de toutes les informations disponibles auprès de sources publiques.
Les avis et opinions sont exprimés à titre indicatif uniquement et ne constituent pas une recommandation de LOIM pour l’achat, la vente ou la détention de quelque titre que ce soit. Les avis et opinions sont donnés en date de cette présentation et sont susceptibles de changer. Ils ne devraient pas être interprétés comme des conseils en investissement.
Aucune partie de ce document ne saurait être (i) copiée, photocopiée ou reproduite sous quelque forme et par quelque moyen que ce soit, ou (ii) distribuée à toute personne autre qu’un employé, cadre, administrateur ou agent autorisé du destinataire sans l’accord préalable de Lombard Odier Funds (Europe) S.A. Au Luxembourg, ce document est utilisé à des fins marketing et a été approuvé par Lombard Odier Funds (Europe) S.A., qui est autorisée et réglementée par la CSSF.
© 2022 Lombard Odier IM. Tous droits réservés.