We use cookies that are necessary to make our site work as well as analytics cookie and third-party cookies to monitor our traffic and to personalise content and ads.
Please click “Cookies Settings” for details on how to withdraw your consent and how to block cookies. For more detailed information about the cookies we use and of who we work this see our cookies policy
Necessary cookies:
Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website and cannot be switched off in our systems. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will then not work. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.
Statistic and marketing cookies:
Statistic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers. We work with third parties and make use of third party cookies to make advertising messaging more relevant to you both on and off this website.
To mark 3-years of investing in fallen angel bonds, we look back at how supply patterns guide opportunities
Active management has been instrumental to our strategy consistently beating the fallen angels index by selecting the most investable fallen angels
The real estate sector provides a strong example of our contrarian approach in action
Since we launched our Fallen Angels Recovery strategy in 2021, we have sought to capture the distinctive benefits of this segment in an active approach designed to address corporate ratings deterioration and take advantage of pricing dislocations. We look back on why careful credit selection is key to optimising potential in fallen angels and how dedicated research and analysis underpin our investment style.
The active advantage to harness strengths
Fallen-angel bonds1 offer many benefits for investors, yet this segment of corporate credit is also prone to idiosyncratic risks that could ultimately make issuers default. Our Fallen Angels Recovery strategy was designed to harness the inherent strengths of the segment while using active tools to limit downside, capture historical recovery patterns and expand the universe when supply is light.
The strategy’s launch in November 2021 took place when the global economy was recovering from the COVID-19 pandemic and corporations were preserving cash and repairing balance sheets. Widespread fiscal and monetary stimulus and ultra-low rates made fertile ground for a rapid improvement in corporate fundamentals. Consequently, companies started on a credit ratings upgrade wave since early 2022.
The oil shock from geopolitics and the Russia-Ukraine war threatened to set off another downgrade wave, largely centred on the eurozone. However, swift government support stopped this process in its tracks, allowing the fundamental improvement process to continue. The real-estate sector did provide some supply of new fallen angels that helped the strategy outperform. However, the volume was much smaller than the significant downgrades of energy and consumer companies in the past.
Fallen-angels supply did not witness a sustained uptick in 2023 and 2024 as the economy was buffeted by inflationary pressures but appeared poised for a soft landing that did not foster widespread rating cuts to high yield. Supply could easily change in the future, however, and we expect fallen angels to continue providing attractive entry points from forced selling in the years to come.
Our track record demonstrates that an active approach and bespoke strategy design are key to enhancing the potential of fallen angels while limiting potential losses for investors.
The past three years have been characterised by a general lack of supply of new fallen angels after the downgrade wave during 2020. In such a regime, our fallen-angels portfolio has behaved like a high-quality, high-yield portfolio. This bias has largely explained its performance patterns since inception.
The Fallen Angels Recovery strategy has employed fundamental bottom-up analysis and two decades of dedicated research to consistently beat the fallen-angels index since inception, regardless of supply fluctuations. For instance, when fallen-angels supply waned, the strategy employed active tilts to expand the universe and ensure deeper liquidity. The strategy has outperformed the high-yield benchmark when its quality bias was advantageous in 2022. When fallen-angels supply waned, the strategy employed active tilts to expand the universe. This meant it has reliably acted as a quality-bias portfolio that remained competitive with the returns of the high-yield index but with relatively lower drawdown.
Figure 1 shows 3-years of active management creating alpha: the Fallen Angels Recovery strategy has returned 7.6% since inception cumulatively, compared to 3.19% return for the fallen-angels index for an outperformance of 441 bps. The strategy also performed competitively against the high-yield benchmark, demonstrating its quality bias. We estimate that our active tilts translated into 45 bps worth of avoided underperformance annually compared to the high-yield benchmark in this period.
FIG. 1. Fallen Angels Recovery strategy gross composite2 performance vs strategy benchmark and fallen angels index3
FIG. 2. Summary risk indicator and synthetic risk and reward indicator4
Our active methodology has been instrumental to outperforming the index, which simply buys all fallen angels indiscriminately and exposes investors to further credit deterioration.
How does the Fallen Angels Recovery strategy use active management to address the drawbacks of a passive strategy? Watch our video.
To limit exposure to fallen angels that could default, we carefully analyse the business and financial profiles of individual companies. We also use precise timing and multiple systematic tilts, aiming to favour the most investable fallen angels. History shows that bond price dislocations are most marked just before or at the time of a bond’s downgrade from investment grade5. By systematically overweighting new fallen angels with the most extreme price reaction, we are able to tap into the maximum price dislocation. Lastly, to expand the universe beyond the index, we invest in other bonds issued by fallen angel issuers after they have been downgraded, provided they meet certain criteria.
A contrarian approach is key to fallen angels as the strategy uncovers value by buying when the broader market sells. A key example was investing in the real estate sector when it was unloved.
The real estate sector – such as residential, commercial and retail landlords rather than developed buildings and builders – was the sector hardest hit by the rapid rise in interest rates from the beginning of 2022. Over the previous decade or so, many new real estate companies had issued debt in the unsecured bond markets to take advantage of very low interest rates at the time and the flexibility of borrowing on an unsecured basis.
Neither the companies, the agencies nor indeed investors had properly considered the impact of the rate cycle turning upwards. When rates rose, property valuations decreased, loan-to-value levels fell below the requirement for an investment-grade rating, downgrades followed, the cost of refinancing increased and investor demand fell.
Real estate companies also had relatively short-term debt maturity profiles, which created the need to refinance a significant portion of their balance sheet every year. This led to liquidity concerns, doubts about the companies’ ability to refinance, rating downgrades and further erosion of investor confidence.
Thus, in 2022 and most of 2023, real estate company bonds were all very weak, with many trading at distressed levels and cash prices below 50 and even into the 30s. Yields were comfortably double digit and in a number of cases above 20% per annum6. Companies were unable to tap the primary market and there was little demand for existing paper in the secondary market.
We viewed this as an opportunity to invest because our research has shown that even in times of sector crisis most companies survive and most bonds recover and repay. We analysed the fundamentals of the players involved and found that they remained sound operationally: vacancies stayed low and rents were generally rising with inflation and being paid on time. We also found that the companies were working hard to refinance bonds maturing imminently and had a number of funding levers available, including accessing the secured bank loan market, raising equity and making disposals.
Selective investment in sufficiently liquid names
Our analysis focussed on a company’s liquidity position: how much cash (or equivalent) they held and how long it would last, assuming no access to the capital markets. At very low prices, we selectively added names that our analysis showed held sufficient liquidity to survive until interest rates retraced and investor sentiment improved.
The strategy has been materially overweight the sector for approximately two years7. Interest rates stabilised early in Q4 2023, investor sentiment has gradually improved, the unsecured market has re-opened, and the sector has rallied strongly over the last 18 months.
When crisis creates opportunity
After three years of success, we look forward to further downgrades creating more attractive entry points from price dislocations. One of the few certainties in investing is that there will always be another crisis in the future. In the meantime, we believe that remaining invested throughout downturns in an active approach remains the best way for investors to tap into long-term patterns that maximise potential.
to learn more about our Fallen Angels Recovery strategy, please click here.
7 sources
view sources.
+
[1] Fallen angels are corporate bonds that have been downgraded from investment-grade ratings to high yield.
[2] Composite and Benchmark Definition
The Fallen Angels Recovery strategy is a long only corporate bond fund launched in November 2021. The strategy is actively managed. The Bloomberg Barclays Global Corporate ex-EM Fallen Angels 3% Issuer Capped TR Index is used to define the initial investment universe for individual security selection. The Bloomberg Barclays Global High Yield Corporate Total Return Index is used for performance comparison as well as for internal risk monitoring purposes. The strategy invests mainly in bonds of “Fallen Angels” issuers; that is, issuers that were previously rated investment grade and that are now rated below investment grade and which one or more of their issues are part of the Bloomberg Barclays Global Corporate ex-EM Fallen Angels 3% Issuer Capped TR index, denominated in any currencies (including Emerging Market currencies) and not graded lower than B. The investment approach is threefold: 1. A systematic top-down approach used to construct the portfolio incorporating the opportunities identified by LOIM research. 2. A bottom-up contribution from credit analysts to enhance returns and reduce credit risk. 3. LOIM’s expertise in sustainability, decarbonisation and ESG. Risk management is performed by fund managers at the portfolio level, alongside independent teams who oversee investment risks and operational risks. The composite benchmark the Bloomberg Barclays Global High Yield Corporate ex-EM TR from 01/05/23, prior to this the benchmark was Bloomberg Barclays Global High Yield Corporate TR. The composite leverage at year end was: 2021- 40.30%, 2022- 60.59% and 2023- 55.88% for the Fallen Angels Recovery strategy. The composite currency is USD.
Management Fees and Other Information
All returns are presented gross of fund total expense ratio. The maximum TER for Fallen Angels Recovery strategy is 0.67% based on the NA share class (investment above CHF 1 million), with a management fee of 0.50%. Withholding tax on income is treated on a cash basis, whereby recoverable withholding tax, dependant on where a client is domiciled, is added back performance when occurring. Further information on calculation methodologies and composite management procedures is available upon request.
GIPS Firm definition
Lombard Odier Investment Managers (LOIM), the institutional asset management unit of Lombard Odier worldwide comprising all discretionary institutional mandates and all Lombard Odier public investment funds managed at the LOIM unit, but excluding Private Equity mandates and funds and the 1798 Hedge Fund family (as of 01.01.2013) as subject to a different management process. LOIM Exchange Traded Funds (ETF's) have been included since launch in April 2015.
Past performance is no guarantee for future results.
Firm Definition and Significant Cash Flow Policy
The firm definition was recently changed by mentioning the non-inclusion of the LOIM Private Equity portfolios and the exclusion of the 1798 Hedge Fund family as of January 1, 2013. This change was done for accuracy purposes and involves no change in the composite list or no material change in the assets under management figures. The firm applied a Significant Cash Flow Policy for this composite until December 31, 2010 whereby portfolios were temporarily excluded from the composite on any significant cash flow occurrence. This practice was abandoned on January 1, 2011 and no portfolios were excluded for significant cash flow reasons as of that date.
[3] Source: LOIM. 01/12/21 to 30/11/24. Performance data comes from a composite. The fallen angels index (Bloomberg Barclays Global Corporate ex-EM Fallen Angels 3% Issuer Capped TR Index) is used to define the initial investment universe for individual security selection. The high-yield benchmark is used for performance comparison as well as for internal risk monitoring purposes. The high-yield benchmark was the Bloomberg Barclays Global High Yield Corporate Total Return Index until May 2023, and Bloomberg Barclays Global High Yield Corporate ex-EM TF since May 2023. Gross return compounded monthly. Risk statistics are calculated with monthly composite and benchmark returns. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. For illustrative purposes only.
[4] Source: LOIM. This summary risk indicator (SRI) is a guide to the level of risk of this product compared to other products. Where there are less than 5-years worth of data, missing returns are simulated using an appropriate benchmark. The SRI may change overtime and should not be used as an indicator of future risk or returns. Even the lowest risk classification does not imply that the Sub-Fund is risk-free or that capital is necessarily guaranteed or protected.
[6] Yields are subject to change and can vary over time. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.
[7] Holdings and/or allocations subject to change. As of 02 December 2024.
important information.
For professional investors use only
This document is a Corporate Communication for Professional Investors only and is not a marketing communication related to a fund, an investment product or investment services in your country. This document is not intended to provide investment, tax, accounting, professional or legal advice.