Ratings downgrade trends in the past are less suited to assessing today’s rating trends. The broad structure of the debt universe has changed over time, and the current mix of bond issuers is far more diverse than it was before the financial crisis. As such, we believe that historical fallen angels data is a poor predictor of the future quantity of fallen angels.
Ratings drift is a better variable to measure fallen angels supply, in our view. Ratings drift is predicted by changes in leverage rather than levels of leverage. Using changes in leverage, we find that expected downgrade rates are in line with historical averages and significantly below periods of credit market sell-offs5.
Overall, a more optimistic picture of corporate leverage emerges when it is assessed using broader metrics and set against a backdrop of changed debt issuance practices over the past decade.
Please find key terms in the glossary
sources.
1 Leverage measures borrowing relative to income, company earnings or a country’s GDP. Private leverage measures debt relative to individual income. Company leverage typically measures the ratio of a corporate’s debt relative to earnings (such as EBITDA). Government leverage is usually measured by the ratio of government borrowing relative to GDP.
2 Source: Factset, WorldScope, LOIM. US corporate debt-to-GDP from March 1988- March 2019. Past performance is not an indicator of future performance.
3 EBITDA refers to a company’s earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization.
4 Refers to alternative leverage ratios of Debt-to-Enterprise Value and Interest-to-EBITDA from Dec 1989 to Jan 2019. Source Factset, WorldScope, LOIM. Past performance is not an indicator of future performance.
5 Based on a regression period of 1990-Jan 2018. Source: Factset, WorldScope, Bloomberg Barclays Indices, Moodys, LOIM calculations.