equities
A whole new paradigm: the next decade
Need to know
|
---|
Source: [1] LOIM, Bloomberg
The exceptional paradigm that has governed the global economy and world equity and debt markets (mainly the US and Europe) in the past four decades risks being severely tested, in our view. This was already the case before Russia invaded Ukraine, and the conflict (even if it is resolves rapidly) could now act as an even more immediate catalyst.
For the first time in the last 100 years, we are experiencing high government debt, accelerating inflation, and unusually high valuations, all at the same time.
The inflation rate is starting to climb back to the level of the 1970s (well above 5%). Debt to GDP levels are similar to those in the post-WW2 period (on average above 100% of GDP), when countries were spending to rebuild after a devastating six-year conflict. PE ratios remain high, especially for growth stocks (even if they have come down a bit recently) − with valuations for unprofitable companies comparable to those at the height of the 1990s dotcom bubble. US and European market capitalisations as a percentage of GDP remain at the highest level of recent decades.
How did we get here? This unstable equilibrium has been made possible by an extended period of low and eventually negative nominal interest rates. Real negative rates in the last two to three years (close to 5% on a spot basis as we write) then resulted in the lowest cost of capital of the last 50 years,2 while credit risk premiums have also massively compressed.3 This remains the case in the first quarter of 2022, despite inflation starting to seriously accelerate (post-Covid demand shock linked to monetary and fiscal policies − around 4% of inflation − combined with supply shock on the energy side − another 4%).
In this six-part report, we outline what has shaped the world in the past 40 years. In subsequent insights, we will further explain why the four main structural trends – what we call mega excesses − could be starting to shift rapidly. We will then try to propose a range of ways forward for active investors.
Sources
We are tracing the birth of the long cycle/paradigm of recent decades back to 1981 and the actions of former US Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker.
Seeking to put a stop to the 1970s era of high inflation, Volcker raised interest rates to a record 20%. That set the stage for decades of disinflation and a one-way direction for both nominal and real rates − downward. The trend accelerated sharply after the global financial crisis 13 years ago and culminated during the Covid crisis of the past two years, when real rates delved further into negative territory (between 2% and 3%).
Interest rates and inflation have declined globally – up to now
Source: LOIM, Bloomberg
Real rates are negative as in the 70s – but with very low nominal yields
Source: LOIM, Bloomberg
None of it would have been possible without the actions of governments and central banks in the developed world, which have tried to avoid recession after recession and the risk of a 1930s-type of downturn ending in deflation and depression. With a combination of ever-more extreme fiscal policy (stimulus payments) and monetary policy (zero and/or negative nominal rates and quantitative easing), they foreshortened the pain by stimulating consumption, which has been growing consistently as a portion of GDP and is culminating at 70% or more in the US and Europe.
These measures intensified after the 2008-2009 global financial crisis, and especially in the past two years (2020-2021) during the pandemic. The consequences are full compression of rates in the credit markets, rapidly increasing equity valuations, especially for the growth bucket (unprofitable tech and biotech companies, for example), real stability in currencies (USD, EUR, JPY, GBP, and CHF) and abnormal performance of multi-asset strategies (equities and bonds).
Credit premium abnormally compressed with huge QEs
Source: LOIM, Bloomberg
Low nominal and real yields has led to high valuations (PE)
Source: LOIM, Bloomberg
Low nominal and real yields has led to still overpriced growth stocks
Source: LOIM, Bloomberg
It has been the combination of four long-term trends, or excesses, that created the conditions for abnormally low/negative nominal/real rates, low inflation and low currency volatility.
We list them here, and then explain their consequences.
- Economy over environment. The whole global economic system has relied on the exploitation of natural capital, which has infinite value but no market price. Around 50% of all economic activities rely on healthy and abundant soil, forests, water and ecosystem services. The abuse of nature allowed global GDP to grow in recent decades while restraining inflation. That is because natural capital and both negative and positive environmental externalities have never been priced properly and are not reflected in GDP measurements.
- Asymmetric capitalism. Fiscal policies and central bank monetary policies have increased substantially in the last 15 years and even more during Covid. Government intervention in the largest economies of the Western world is now above 50% of GDP – and matching levels of Cuba (almost 60%) in countries such as France and Italy!4 As low/negative interest rates fuelled gains in bond and equity markets, capital holders have grown much richer, while those relying just on their salaries have grown relatively poorer. This asymmetric capitalism is unusual in economic history. It would be natural to assume that more government intervention would lessen inequalities, but in fact the opposite has occurred.
- Demographic dividend. We can point to four major demographic factors in the last 30-40 years that caused GDP growth to exceed wage growth on a global basis a) The post-war baby boom sparked a surge in the working-age population starting in the 1960s; b) large numbers of women have joined the job market every year starting from the 1980s; c) the end of communism in the early 1990s and China’s inclusion in the WTO in 2001 have put 1.5 billion more people in the global workforce with much lower wages than their equivalents in the Western world; and d) the flow of immigration has been constant in Europe and in the US and has consequently put pressure on wages in these geographies.
- Globalisation. While benefiting from cheap labour, the US and Europe have also reorganised their global production capacity to reduce goods inflation as much as possible, with a growing inter-connection between the three large blocks – North America, Europe and Northern Asia. China has been the main beneficiary, growing from 4% of world GDP to 18% within an astonishing 20 years. Goods inflation has been much lower than GDP growth, with all of those imports coming from the Far East.
In summary, the four long, secular trends have created the conditions for an extended period of disinflation for both goods and services, which has allowed interest rates to remain low or (more recently) negative and favoured currency stability. However, they have also generated anomalies (which are not just temporary imbalances), with severely negative consequences for our economic and social systems, as well as our global Environment. We believe these trends could now be set to reverse.
We will first outline the unfortunate anomalies and then explain the catalysts for correcting them.
- Higher temperatures and the destruction of natural capital. The nine planetary boundaries that define a safe living environment for humanity have already been crossed or are under threat. Temperatures have been pushed to dangerous levels, and many parts of the world face water scarcity and other threats.
- High inequalities. Government intervention has counterintuitively fuelled massive social inequalities. From the post-war period through the 1990s, wages increased 8% per year while the value of capital grew 6%. Since 2010, capital has returned almost 9% while labour’s gains dwindled to less than 4%.
- Compressed wages and high savings. The most impressive labour force expansion in the history of capitalism has meant there has been little need to pay more to attract workers, leading to relatively stagnant wages. At the same time, savings have disproportionately increased as a percentage of GDP (from 40% in 1950 to 65% in 2021 in the US). This enormous pool of savings has helped to push interest rates down or negative.
- Low goods inflation and stable currencies. Globalisation has also led to much lower currency volatility (5% in the last decade versus at least 10% in the 1970s-80s), with a strong alignment of economic policies between the main blocks. This period also saw relatively little geopolitical tension, which helped ease financial integration among countries and limit forex fluctuations.
Global financial synchronization leading to an abnormally low fx volatility
Source: LOIM, Bloomberg
In our view, each of these anomalies is the outcome of trends that cannot continue. To quote the economist Herbert Stein, “If something cannot go on forever, it will stop.” (16th January 1986, Symposium on the 40th anniversary of the Joint Economic Committee)
Sources
4 Bloomberg, LOIM
We expect the next decade will be dramatically different. Four corresponding mega shifts are likely to lead to structurally higher inflation, and by extension higher interest rates (both nominal and real). In other words, a complete reversal of the last 40 years’ paradigm.
FIG 1. End of the anomalies: click on the image to see the corresponding mega shifts
- Environmental transition. The investment required to move to a more sustainable economy could drain savings. We estimate that a combined USD 5 trillion needs to be spent by the US, Europe and Asia on infrastructure and production to reduce reliance on fossil fuels and limit temperatures to 1.5⁰ to 2⁰ above pre-industrial levels. Even if solar and wind are free, the amount of capex needed to transform cities/infrastructure/factories will probably absorb excess savings5 (pushing up rates) and promote goods inflation (for more sophisticated products). Preservation of biodiversity will also add USD 400 billion of annual investment to protect nature. We believe the next 10 to 20 years will show us that externalities have a price, and market participants will have to factor the cost of destroying nature into their decision-making.
Rising inflation puts the system to a test
Source: LOIM, Bloomberg
- Symmetry returns to capitalism. The extreme level of wealth inequalities increases the risk of social and political disruption. Corporate margins and earnings are also at all-time highs (with real return on capital employed of about 15%). Government debt at wartime levels is coinciding with commitments to fiscal expansion. Collecting sufficient tax revenues is now not only an economic necessity, but also a political tool to rebalance capitalism’s excesses. We envision a shift from taxing labour to taxing wealth (higher wealth and inheritance taxes). Building a fairer system that will reward labour and reduce the ability of global corporations to seek out the lowest-tax regimes is taking shape. It is therefore likely that corporate tax will increase.6
Negative real rates have allowed an exceptional level of government debt
Source: LOIM, Bloomberg
But real returns on equity (RRoE) are high…
Source: LOIM, Bloomberg - Demographic shift. We estimate that the global workforce will shrink by an average of 4-5% every five years over the next five decades.7 Such shrinkage is unprecedented in modern history and will force companies into a race for skilled workers. At the same time, an ageing society will require new labour-intensive services. This competition is likely to push up wages worldwide.
- A regionalised world. Regional polarisation could prevail with increased macroeconomic fragmentation. Each block (North America, Europe, Northern Asia) will probably now move according to its own strategic and economic priorities. Globalisation has elongated supply chains across the world and the search for efficiency has normalised just-in-time systems. Covid/political crises, and now the war in Ukraine, are deeply exposing the flaws of such practices by creating bottlenecks and disruptions across regions, and more importantly putting strategic independence in sectors (medicines, energy, food, etc.) at risk. Governments and corporates will probably reconsider the trade-off between efficiency and security in terms of supply in key areas. Regional independency and self-sufficiency are set to coincide with higher costs as environmental concerns take centre stage, in our view.
Sources
We believe that the mega excesses that have shaped the world in the past four decades and made capital so cheap and plentiful are unlikely to persist. The four mega shifts are each inflationary by nature for goods and wages, while the investment in the environmental transition could absorb all available savings. These shifts that we envision are therefore likely to drive up both inflation and rates.
As the chart below shows, the equity market has already partially adapted to what could be the new world. The equity risk premium has surged to levels last seen in the 1970s if we use spot inflation to calculate the current real rates. In the coming months, it remains to be seen whether the EQRP falls sharply (because of either a deterioration of corporates’ real return on capital employed and/or real rates coming back to 0) or remains elevated in a scenario where inflation is structurally high like in the ‘70s.
The next decade is likely to bring both shocks and opportunities for investors, who must be prepared to adapt to the new paradigm.
Equity Risk Premium remains relatively attractive
Source: LOIM, Bloomberg
In subsequent insights of this six-part report, we will explain each mega excess in more detail, as well as the consequent anomaly and mega shift.
important information.
For professional investor use only
This document has been issued by Lombard Odier Funds (Europe) S.A. a Luxembourg based public limited company (SA), having its registered office at 291, route d’Arlon, 1150 Luxembourg, authorised and regulated by the CSSF as a Management Company within the meaning of EU Directive 2009/65/EC, as amended; and within the meaning of the EU Directive 2011/61/EU on Alternative Investment Fund Managers (AIFMD). The purpose of the Management Company is the creation, promotion, administration, management and the marketing of Luxembourg and foreign UCITS, alternative investment funds ("AIFs") and other regulated funds, collective investment vehicles or other investment vehicles, as well as the offering of portfolio management and investment advisory services.
Lombard Odier Investment Managers (“LOIM”) is a trade name.
This document is provided for information purposes only and does not constitute an offer or a recommendation to purchase or sell any security or service. It is not intended for distribution, publication, or use in any jurisdiction where such distribution, publication, or use would be unlawful. This material does not contain personalized recommendations or advice and is not intended to substitute any professional advice on investment in financial products. Before entering into any transaction, an investor should consider carefully the suitability of a transaction to his/her particular circumstances and, where necessary, obtain independent professional advice in respect of risks, as well as any legal, regulatory, credit, tax, and accounting consequences. This document is the property of LOIM and is addressed to its recipient exclusively for their personal use. It may not be reproduced (in whole or in part), transmitted, modified, or used for any other purpose without the prior written permission of LOIM. This material contains the opinions of LOIM, as at the date of issue.
Neither this document nor any copy thereof may be sent, taken into, or distributed in the United States of America, any of its territories or possessions or areas subject to its jurisdiction, or to or for the benefit of a United States Person. For this purpose, the term "United States Person" shall mean any citizen, national or resident of the United States of America, partnership organized or existing in any state, territory or possession of the United States of America, a corporation organized under the laws of the United States or of any state, territory or possession thereof, or any estate or trust that is subject to United States Federal income tax regardless of the source of its income.
Source of the figures: Unless otherwise stated, figures are prepared by LOIM.
Although certain information has been obtained from public sources believed to be reliable, without independent verification, we cannot guarantee its accuracy or the completeness of all information available from public sources.
Views and opinions expressed are for informational purposes only and do not constitute a recommendation by LOIM to buy, sell or hold any security. Views and opinions are current as of the date of this presentation and may be subject to change. They should not be construed as investment advice.
No part of this material may be (i) copied, photocopied or duplicated in any form, by any means, or (ii) distributed to any person that is not an employee, officer, director, or authorised agent of the recipient, without Lombard Odier Funds (Europe) S.A prior consent. In Luxembourg, this material is a marketing material and has been approved by Lombard Odier Funds (Europe) S.A. which is authorized and regulated by the CSSF.
©2022 Lombard Odier IM. All rights reserved.